Boris F. Poltoratsky
PHYSICS HISTORY
(ONE RUNAWAY FROM FERITY)
Moscow
2010
Boris F. Poltoratsky
PHYSICS HISTORY
(ONE RUNAWAY FROM MAGIZM)
The history of physics from natural
sciences rudiments during prehistoric times to a condition of our days is
stated concisely in this brochure. The special attention is given to the
reasons of ideas occurrence of materialism in an ancient society, and also
history of its coordination with religious beliefs. We have found out here
preconditions and logic of derivation of the fundamental equations of physics,
and also their role in formation of modern sciences. Roots and the mechanism of
basic errors in the theoretical physics, which finally have led to prompt
degradation of this science within 20th century and the beginning of
21st are analyzed.
The first part of the analysis of
historic facts is subordinated to a substantiation of legitimacy of a main
point: how the physics has turned to the contrast – the dogmatic
pseudo-physics? Further an attention maximum is concentrated on the given
reason and answer to this central question. Variants of possible exits from
historical deadlock are in summary offered.
The image
on a cover: N.K. Roerich. Idols
ÎÃËÀÂËÅÍÈÅ
The preface
………………………………………………………….………………...4
1. Physics position in
cultures and religions medium
Introduction ……………………………………………………………….…… …...6
Features of the ancient
culture ………………………………………….………… 8
Philosophical opening of physics…………………………………………………………11
2.
Physics – twists of history
The classical physics ……………………………………………………………… ..16
Physics of 20th and
the beginnings of 21st centuries…………… ……..……...25
Psychological roots of New
Magizm ……………………………………….………..….28
Philosophical turn …………………………………………………………………… ..31
That the policy
does in the physics ……………..………………………..………..34
New paganism and
system crisis..…………………….…….………..……………..30
What further?…………..……………..…………………………..…….………………41
The conclusion ……………………..…………………………………….…….……..43
Bibliography……………………...
……………….…………………………45
The
preface
The author collected a
material for this short review of history of physics gradually in the course of
a writing of the prologues of the previous books, especially «Electrodynamics
in the field and matter theory» [1] and «From physics to hypotheses» [2]. But
the idea of the edition of the separate brochure has definitively ripened in
the course of the analysis of the maintenance of discussions on a theme «School
course «Religion and atheism history»» at a forum of the President http://medvedev-da.ru/forum.php in
section «Education in Russia». Naturally, we are grateful to interlocutors for
useful ideas, which they have shared, and to forum moderators for its fine
organization.
All the matter is
that on closer examination religion and physics have appeared epistemological
very rigidly connected among themselves. They have the general informative tool
– intuition. Probably therefore all philosophers-classics had these both fields
of activity of human reason in the field of vision simultaneously, completely
not casually having connected their stories together.
In religion the
intuition place can be understood from definition, which was given by archpriest Alexander Men [3]: «the Belief is
first of all the condition of spirit born by experience of a Divine reality. In
it the intuitive knowledge (it is allocated by us) of special
type awakes up, something is made similar to a meeting, the mysterious appeal
sounds. The person answers this appeal: religious doctrines with their
metaphysics and with their ethics also are such answers. Not only mystical
vision of belief is comprehended in them, but also attempt to establish «a
feedback», with that secret Essence which has concerned the
person by a their spirit». In this application intuition is a basis of
religious knowledge or a religious science according to Tomas Aquinas. And the
main form of its manifestation are, of course, revelations of the individuals,
gifted by «Essence, which has concerned the person by a their spirit».
The intuition in the
physicist plays absolutely other role. Here the Nature is exclusively a
knowledge source. The nature is it in the generalized sense, and exactly it is
a matter and its movement. Therefore the intuition too is pertinent in the
physicist, but here it cannot be a source of knowledge, to be exact as a source
of the information on the nature. Its functions are limited only by an
auxiliary role in formation of idea and the organization of concrete experiment
(as at G.Galilej). It also is present and at synthesis of new experimental data
together with those data which were earlier known from the previous
experiments, i.e. at a choice of a technique of processing of already known
information (as, for example, at M.Planck or D.M.Mendeleyev). Certainly, any individual
can declare, that he sees this nature so all through and without experiments.
He sees it absolutely simply through ostensibly revelation given from above
personally to it. However on a source of the information of which he has taken,
it is easy to define that here we deal not with physics, but with religion and,
most likely, with any one of its sectarian forms. It is an example of the open,
obvious case of revelation application in the physicist. The veiled meet much
more often. But the essence remains and then is final. The researcher of
physics necessarily should see here it though it completely not simply to make.
Thus, physicist is
compelled to use in the course of the Nature study such tool, which already was
used earlier by religion. But change of a field of application of an instrument
should cause and certain changes in it according to new specialization. And
here this change of functions of the tool, naturally, is always fraught with
errors. It conducts to substitution of object of knowledge, when the researcher
himself objectively existing (for believers – already created by God) Nature
replaces by a substitute ("model", a hypothesis, a postulate etc.),
which is born only by its imagination (intuition), and as a matter of fact – through
revelation. And anybody from theorists-visionaries has not been confused by
that fact that such "modeling" has been already repeatedly done at
formation of the most different pagan beliefs and systems of legends (of
legendary systems) – and any coincidence to the reality never happened. Now
failure has occurred simultaneously both in the physicist and in philosophy
[2]. Here, in general, logic deadlocks are clear. But to understand each of
them separately, it is necessary to involve basic data from history and bases
of all religions, and also from dialectics of development of natural sciences.
Therefore, analyzing
the reasons of occurrence of deadlock on a way of development of physics, we
have been simply compelled to address to history of this subject in the light
of that knowledge, that to us were given by such great thinkers, as Aristotle,
Averroes, Foma Akvinsky, Newton, Maksvell etc.
Naturally, we could
not ignore and an inquisition role in natural sciences development. But the
policy has here got to this brochure yourself. Moreover, the political
component takes out blankly all clews of our problems beyond the frameworks of
that habitual, that are called known word as an "error".
This book is
addressed to pupils of the senior classes, teachers, students, engineers,
physicists-experimenters and theorists, and also other inquisitive people, whom
it is at least superficial, let even under reference book or the popular
literature, are familiar with problems of modern physics.
The author
1. Physics position in
cultures and religions medium
Introduction
In brochure «From Physics to
Hypothesis» [2] we paid attention to the strange physical theories made of absurd
proclamations by the slightly competent dreamers. One such “theorist”
proclaimed “the model” capable to cancel the laws of Nature and pretended as if
this model cancelled the laws really; the second one cawed such a “tensor”
which supposedly exhales gravitation even for the universe as a whole; the
third “theorist” – who also is not of the shy persons – piled up the fairy
stack of the unbelievable Hypotheses and from there from above from the for
calls the Bose particles’ phantoms. The grand, exclusively brave fraud in
science was revealed, as one could say, by itself. And above all – the period
of being “the noodle on the ears” (great hoax) have lasted for more than 100
years. It’s the unique achievement – maybe even the historical record. Only the
revolutionists, by very disciplined people who are keen on any special idea
that maybe is non-peaceful at all, can arrange the similar thing. We would not
like to miss such an important event. At that it should be considered that this
fraud couldn’t be seen fully from a short distance. So we need to think of the
distance to see the historical background.
Therefore we address to
history of science as well as of culture.
For this exclusively
specific analytic problem we will have to systematize the history
correspondingly marking it with landmarks suitable for this problem and so
needed for us.
Firstly, physics as science
begins from the determination, which allows distinguishing it from the other
sciences. And this determination and its interpretation answer the questions:
“What is the subject of this science?” and “What are its goals and methods?”
Since answers for these questions are in book “Physics” by Aristotle [4, 5]
(384-322 BC) the time of its publication is the first landmark in the history of
Physics.
Secondly, Aristotle alone
could not solve all philosophical and other problems of Physics. Certainly, he
tried to do something but his attempts left only to the descendants the
volumetric enough list of his surmises both in philosophy and in physics that
have not been confirmed so far. In particularly, many centuries passed before
Averroes (1126-1198) and Thomas Aquinas (1221-1274) could separate finally
Natural History from Religion. So the works of the latter [6] can mark the end
of the philosophical understanding of Physics as a science. By this way we
highlighted the second historical landmark.
Thirdly, the works of
Averroes and Thomas Aquinas started the stormy development if normal classical
Physics. Without them the religion reaction for the principal works of Galilee
G. would have been so negative that they would have deserved only censure and
correspondingly have been forgotten soon. Separation of Physics from religion
provided the free development of Physics. However, in the beginning of 20th
century this process was ended by the followers of substitution of the subject
of inquiry in this science. There was nature i.e. the existing real substance
and its movement. But a set of “models”, postulates, hypotheses born by fantasy
(revelation) and others appeared. The science returned to its ancient state and
turned again either into a system of naïve legends or into religion
operating by afflatus of extremely insolent false prophets. So in the beginning
of 20th century there is the third critical landmark in the history of
Physics.
Duration of development of
human societies is estimated in about 50000 years. But this time includes the prehistoric period about the state of
science in which we can only guess. However, the stages of the physical
processes for the last 3000 years in which we are interested have been known
and can be shown in the diagram, ref. Fig.1. Our landmarks or critical points
of the history of science into the following parts have divided that period: I – ancient Physics, II – philosophical
discovery of Physics, III –classical period, IV – modern stage.
Fig. 1
Here the straight and broken
lines designate the course of development of general technical experiment of
the humanity as well as states of philosophy of Physics and theoretical Physics
itself. Accumulation of technical and scientific knowledge were increasing
approximately according to exponential law so their temporary dependences in
course of increase were reflected by the straight lines in the coordinates with
logarithmic scale along the axis Y.
Technical knowledge and
achievements were being added constantly so its amount is shown in Fig 1 by the
solid straight line with the positive derivative.
Period II was characterized
with continuous development of the philosophy of Physics that also was
reflected with the straight line with the positive slope (derivative) in Fig.1.
Then separation of religion from the natural history have stabilized situation
during the classical period (III). The perfidious occupation of this scientific
field by the new mystics at IV stage turned the philosophy of Physics into
antiquated pre-Aristotle state. Such course of history of development of
philosophic principles of Physics is presented with anisopleural trapeze correspondingly.
The graph of development of
the theoretical Physics looks more complicated. The theoretical Physics has
been developing slowly since the time of Aristotle or since the earlier time
mainly due to statics and kinematics in mechanic. During the classical period
the rapid increase marked in Fig. 1 by the inclined line with the larger
derivative took place. At stage IV the theoretic Physics crashed down and was
substituted by the fashionable false Physics.
In brief, Fig.1 is some
approximation of the known facts, something as the result of the preliminary
processing of the experimental data – initial estimated case.
Now we intent to look
through these processes in details to answer the following questions:
Is not it in reality?
Why did it happen?
What are the consequences of
that?
Features
of the ancient culture
Science
is a part of culture. So their histories are connected with each other. And in
accordance with culture we should select perspectives for consideration of its
problems and councils whose experiment can be used and to whose works shall be
referred.
So, it is
a choice of councils.
President
of the USA, Bush the Junior called officially the modern Western culture as “Judeo-Christian
civilization”. And this “civilization” is no fiction, no propagating move of a
sly politician, no a fantasy of a theoretical historian, it is an objective
reality leading the real wars on the Asian land not for a while yet and with
blood that is not illusory. So we will pay the proper attention to this fact
and select a council from those authors who knew what it meant. The person who
is the closest to our requirements was Orthodox Priest – Archpriest Alexander Men. According to the biographic data he knew
both constituents of the “Judeo-Christian civilization” and left for us the
work called “History of religion” [3].
Hereunder
quotations are presented from this book, which are numbered by us, and also our
logical conclusions flowing out from Alexander Men are put.
1. «If
you remember that the first traces of the human existence address to the time
which is away from our time for 50000-40000 years, the history of civilization
will be in front of us in form of explosion disturbing the silence. In fact, in
comparison with 5000 – 6000 years of the historical times the prehistoric night
lasts for extremely long time”. (p. 61).
2. «And
nevertheless, the prehistoric night had been lasting for many thousand years. A
human had been an integral particle of a family, tribe for that time, the
creative spirit of a personality had not been awakened in a human. The progress
had not almost been felt… .
What
slowed the culture progress?
… in
primitive beliefs there is something that can shed some light on this problem.
The survived centers of “primitive world” show that the magical conceptions
have the colossal force and are capable to keep the whole societies in state of
immobility. “Collective conceptions” of Magizm connected with taboo, rituals
and traditions leave its imprint on all manifestations of life of Australians,
Papuans, Zulus.
Ideas and
beliefs have rather more influence on life of society than it seems at first
glance. And if we consider the power that the Magizm had over the people’s
souls the remarkable stability of the primitive world is getting not so
mysterious.
The
«magic human being» took the world as the complete substantive and mental
whole, as continuous circulation of gods and human beings, living creatures and
elements, as original hierarchy of double-gangers, human beings and dumb
animals. In his ceremonies the human being imitated the life of nature as if he
took part in natural processes; through totemism he became related with the
world of living creatures (marked out by us because “imitation” in our new
interpretation is a physical “model”). His life was a constant religious rite,
he was afraid to disturb even one link in the space mystery avoiding to be
thrown out the limits of the real existence.
So it is
naturally that the fear to cross the sacral line of the ritual, to encroach
upon stability of “collective conceptions” exerted the paralyzing influence on
the spiritual culture. That fear set the firm frames for the human beings out
of which the creative spirit pushed through only with great difficulty.” (p.
62).
3. «…
Magizm always existed in parallel with various religious systems and poisoned
them with the ritual determinism.
Magizm introduced into religion the blind almost maniacal belief in all
power of rituals and paternosters … .
So
gradually the magic world view developed that closed all the Universal into the
causal chain of consequences where the great role was played by ceremonies. If
the rituals were not performed the sun could not raise, spring could not come.
The persuasion was strengthened that ceremonies needed for demons and gods”.
(page 57, 58).
4.
«Peoples, who did not dare to change even iota in the established canons for
thousands years, are victims of the “collective conceptions” of magic. They
paralyzed creative activity and religious genius of humans because only in
understanding of personal responsibility and mental freedom he finds his
highest vocation as the image of the Creator of the Universal”. (p. 58).
On base of
these four quotations the following conclusions on the ancient culture and the
science correspondingly can be made:
Firstly,
the facts say really that the centuries-old cultural stagnation existed and
that the main braking factor for development of science and culture was archaic
ideology based on the pagan religion such as Magizm.
Secondly,
all world in its variety was felt by people tormented by Magizm not directly as
it is in reality but through the models in form of totems, amulets, idols and
others. And it was an impassable barrier for the nature studying. In fact we
wrote many times about the blood analysis for diagnostic of the patient. Cannot
the doctor diagnose the illness even under the most complicated human’s blood
model? For that the blood itself and the blood of the particular person is
required. The same situation took place also in the science of Nature i.e. in
Physics. The object of the Physics studying cannot be a model, but the nature
itself shall be investigated.
Further
per example of ancient Egypt the ethical properties of religion of that time
and organization structure of its servants are illustrated.
5.
«Meanwhile Egyptian religion was impregnated with lies and self-interests.
Conjurations as a rule were made on base of the fact that gods and spirits were
deceived. So, for a example, the parturiating woman called the gods trying to
convince them that she was Goddess Isida giving birth to a baby. If the man was threatened by a poisonous
snake he said the exorcizing words convincing the shake poison that he was not
a human being but God Gor who controls over elements. So the magic “gave amoral
character to Egyptian religion” (p.66).
On basis
of this another conclusion shall be made:
Thirdly,
in that time many years ago religious immorality was considered as generally
recognized fact but not as a reprehensible feature and quite the contrary – as
an element of culture and religion under the mutual agreement of people and
gods. If somebody thought about the truth search through the straight and
honesty look at the Nature he/she immediately fell under the road-roller of
that immorality and was killed. There was hidden the base ideological support
and root of stability of unscientific systems. Either Nature or human intellect
will be able to take out nobody and never from such a grand trap of the Magizm.
The guerrilla warfare was also punished, after all.
Fourthly,
it is worth dwelling especially on a special role of tsars and priests in the
system of Magizm. This problem has been revealed in the following sentences,
which are not in need for comments:
6. «Magic
in a certain sense was so difficult as
science. It demanded the extensive knowledge from the man who wanted to use its
might. So people who became proficient in all minutest details of magic got the
great power over the people”.
(p.66).
7. «Tsar made a furrow with a plough to wake up
the land forces, threw to the Nile the papyrus with order to begin the flood.
So the Pharaoh concentrated in his hands the power over the Universe, over
elements and over the people. “The son of gods, gifted with the supernatural
grace, armored with the magical weapons, crowned with the living diadems in
which the goddesses were incarnated, with the forehead wound round by the snake,
goddess of conjurations, the Tsar is the first and the most powerful of the
Magians””. (pp. 67, 68).
8.
«Strabon mentions of the priests. In his time they were already the centralized
and powerful corporation. But this corporation appeared not right away. The
priests and clairvoyants originally were dispersed over various regions and
they did not have the high sovereign. In spite of the fact that their service
to gods often interlaced with the magic they very early began to be strongly
attracted to the poorer religious cult. The religious usurpation of the
Pharaohs could not undermine the influence of the priests … . In particular,
they conducted the mathematical calculations and astronomical observations so
needed for construction and irrigation. The Mystery with which they surrounded
their knowledge made them invulnerable.
After
Mina «the state form of religion appeared … where the Pharaoh played the
leading role. In theory only he alone served to gods». However, in fact the
clergy kept the leading hand in religion”. (p.68).
So,
during tens of a thousand years development of culture and science of all the
mankind was restrained artificially by mass prejudices of Magizm. Magizm torn
away the sense of people from reality by creation of mediators between the
human and nature in form of various “models” named as totems, amulets, idols
and so on. The “models” were protected with the system of taboos, rituals,
conjurations and traditions originally impregnated with deception and
immorality. People could not learn the nature itself not only due to the
religious and ideological reasons but also due to organizational reasons
because people were under the strong control of tsars and shamans who were
interested in ignorance.
Philosophic discovery of Physics
Let’s
refer to the prehistory of Aristotelian doctrines.
Somewhere
in the second thousand years B.C. the lands of Ancient Greece were subject to
conquests by the Achaeans from the north. Alexander Men said about them by the
following way [3].
«The
Achaean knights were attracted by strong feelings; they loved hunting wild
boars with hounds over the mountain forests… The huge cups and bowls confirm
the Homer’s stories about love of his heroes to strong drinks. In the frescos
we see singers and narrators. The epic heroes liked songs praising their feats
and travels.” (p. 176).
«External
blooming of the Achaeans land was connected closely with the spiritual raise of
Greeks. The time came when the hidden spiritual forces of culture broke the
chitinous armour of Magizm and rushed by the new ways to find the other world
view.” (p. 177).
«But the
time came when the true Hellenic spirit woke up and the reaction began against
the local cults. This coincided with the external rise of the Achaeans towns.”
(p. 178).
In short,
the Achaeans were bringing the source of materialism. With such an ungovernable
character that man survived more frequently who understood the reality better,
who distinguished the real weapons and blood from totems and models of weapons
and blood better and whose fantasies did not prevent the right reconnaissance.
Invasions of peoples such as the Achaeans but more martial and pragmatic ones
continued from the North from behind the Danube, at least before Alexander the
Macedonian and, therefore, before the time when Aristotle wrote his books. It
happened that the philosopher worked in the atmosphere of permanent ideological
liberation. (It mentions Stalin’s ideological indulgences during the war).
As we
wrote before, the Aristotle’s doctrines were the beginning of the true Physics,
which he stated in the book of the same name [4]. In this book he formulated
the main conceptions defining the content of this science. The Aristotle’s
Physics was based on his own discoveries and works of philosophers of many
different schools.
Here are
the basic theses of this work:
- Physics differs fundamentally from the
other sciences including metaphysics and mathematics.
- Physics is science of nature, which according
to Aristotle is specified by the following way: “So, it is clear that in the
natural phenomena the necessity is so called substance and its movements”. And
“that is one way of definition of nature: it is the first substance underlying
in the base of each of [subjects] having inside the origin of motion and
changing”.
- The purpose of Physics is naturally
identification of the cause-effect relations in the substance and in its
motion: «…the physicist has to say about the reasons of the both kinds but more
about [the cause] “for the sake of what” because it is the cause of the
[certain] substance but no substance is the reason of the purpose”.
- Physics has the own methods of
investigations: “When studying the causes of the origin of the whole after the
part the following method is applied: it is observed what appeared before and
what after, what performed or experimentd [any actions] firstly and so all the
time step by step”. We shall notice that nothing has been said about the hypotheses,
postulates and models here.
Nowadays
we know that the first and the second theses are true undoubtedly. And two the
other theses reflect immature enough understanding of the subject of
investigations. For example, the third thesis contains the remains of confusion
between Physics (question: “Why”) and religion (question: “For sake of what”).
The fourth thesis found out incompleteness after demonstration by Galilei of
his purposeful and competent experiments.
The
Peripatetics (continuators of the Aristotle’s acts) had been discussing this
doctrine for 600 years but no new breaks took place.
The
following Muslim scientists caught the initiative and explained the Aristotle’s
philosophy to their pupils:
Abu
Yusuph Yakub ibn Iskhak ibn Sabbakh al-Kindi (died aboit 873) was the first in
the Moslem world to address to the philosophic Aristotelian works and became
the founder of paripatetizm in the Moslem East.
Abu Nasr Mohammed ibn
Mohammad ibn Tarkhan ibn Uzlag
al-Farabi (873—950) was a famous Moslem philosopher, author of comments to the
Aristotle’s works.
Ibn
Badzha was a pupil and follower of al-Farabi’s work.
Abu Ali
al-Husayn ibn Abd Allah ibn Sina (Avicenna, 980-1037) was a doctor, writer and
philosopher.
The greatest Moslem commentator of
Aristotle was Abu al-Valid Mohammad ibn Akhmad ibn Rushd (Averroes, 1126-1198).
This philosopher has developed further Aristotleizm, having
defined a physics place in a religious frame of reference. He first
investigated a difference between religions in general and physics, as
subsystems of views in religion, which remained not understood from the
Aristotle. Christian seminary students and
philosophers of Europe have used subsequently his works.
Abu Bekr
Mohammed ibn Abd al-Malic ibn Tufail (1110-1185) was a doctor, philosopher,
friend and interlocutor of ibn Rushd.
It is
appropriate mention here Maimonid: “… Moshe ben Maimon… 1135-1204 …) is the
greatest rabbinic authority and codificator of Galaxy, philosopher, scientist
and doctor; … According to his philosophic views Maimonid was the follower of
Aristotle. In particular he put the medieval Jewish philosophy on the strong
base of Aristotelism” (Electronic Jewish encyclopedia).
At least,
6 Moslem and 1 Jewish philosophers translated into Latin and given to Europeans
the Aristotle’s doctrine and paved the way for critical break of his philosophy
into the real science such as Physics. This final success has been connected
for ever with the name of one of the founders of Sorbonne – Thomas Aquinas
(1225-1274).
Firstly,
he made clear the principle of causality in the real “sensible world” which he
used in the second evidence of existence of God by the following way: “In the
sensible world we observe the [definite] order of the acting causes. And there
is [there will be] no case when a thing would be an acting cause of itself;
because then it would precede itself that it is impossible. Also one must not take away the acting
causes [causally-acting order] to infinity, because in the ordered consecution
of the acting causes the first one is the cause of the intermediate one and the
intermediate cause is the cause of the last one; at that the number of the
intermediate causes can be as several so one. Then, eliminating the cause we
eliminate the consequence. So if in the causal [order] there was no first cause
then there would be no last or intermediate one. And if it was possible the [raw] of causes went to infinity there
would be neither first acting cause nor last consequence, nor any intermediate
causes; all that is obvious false [assumption]. So it is necessary to arrive
[at an idea] of the first acting cause that everyone
calls God.” [6].
So the
chains of causes stopped doubling.
Let’s note that if we substitute the word “God” by the word “Nature” any
pagans including atheists will understand the author’s ideas also.
Secondly,
he pointed to the exclusive connection of the Physics with the substance
leaving revelations to the other sciences: “Difference of ways of perception
creates the variety of sciences. Both an astronomer and a physicist can go to
the same conclusion, for example, that the Earth is round; but an astronomer
will come to that by mathematically (i.e. [ratiocinating] separately from
substance) and a physicist – always having in view the substance. From this it
follows that there are no grounds to suppose that if any things can be
understood by the philosophic science as far as they can be understood [at all]
by natural mind, at the same time they cannot be given to us through the other
science, as far as they have been presented in the revelation”. (in the same
place).
So Physics has kept
from mysticism. It has
received full freedom within its competence, i.e. in that area of studying of
causes and effects which is limited by a matter and its movement. Only «the
first acting cause »
remains in religion. Physics must not be muddled up neither with logics nor
with its concentrated part – mathematics. The other events only confirmed
correctness and productivity of philosophy of Physics created by humanity for
16 centuries of thoughts and searching.
Now
physicists could continue the work of philosophers creatively. They
proved practically efficiency of the following chain of steps during the
investigation of Nature:
– Observation over substance and its
motion (under Aristotle),
– Experimental conception (in case of
demarcation with religion under Thomas Aquinas),
– The prepared and verifiable experiment
(under Galilee, Ampere, Faraday and others),
– Empirical formula as the physical law
of Nature (under Galilee and Descartes, Faraday and others),
– Logical (mathematical) consequences of
the law of nature (under Newton, Maxwell, Hertz and others).
The last
stage usually contains (at this stage of development of mathematics) the
transformation of the integral form of the law, which is the result of the
experimental measurements, into the differential form, which gives as a result
the equations of the mathematical Physics.
So, the humanity gained lucidity of mind, and
the way of development of physics was discovered.
Here we see result of unique historical process in which Magizm for the
first time has given way to a science, it has been dislodged simply out by a
civilization. By the way we will look narrowly, and where was then inquisition?
After all it raged just after 2 centuries after Thomas Akvinsky (1225 – 1274)
and 1,5 centuries prior to opening of Galileo Galilee (1564-1642). What role of
the Greatest Inquisitor in this process?
«That Thomas Torkvemada made in second half XV
centuries in Spain – the present tragedy which consequences are still felt till
now. Torkvemada is likely the most terrible and ominous inquisitor for all
history of this awful organisation. And it has to this day admirers …» (Michael
Myzgin. Biographies: Thomas Torkvemada, the Great inquisitor. http://www.family-history.ru/materia/biography/biography_6.html ).
All it is so, but atrocities will not surprise us who have endured 20th
century. Their quantity became incommensurable now more, they became even more
terrible. Therefore we can look at a problem without emotions and ask: how inquisition
has affected a duel of physics with Magizm? And it is very well. That horror,
which Torkvemada has scared on pagan priests, then pursued the whole 500 years
their potential followers. Incorruptibility of the Great Inquisitor (he has
forced the king to refuse an enormous bribe) only strengthened a bodily fear
transferred to the subsequent generations.
A bit later we will see that in 20th century the immunity has died away.
Following inquisitors have inhaled a life in it would seem already dead Magizm
and now have moved on a scaffold physicists. In this sense Michael Myzgina's
last phrase in the citation from above has appeared prophetical.
2. Physics – twists of history
Classical Physics
The ground and origin of classical physics is mechanics.
Mechanics often is considered according to prehistory of its studying
beginning from statics. But statics is contained in the final case of dynamics
(if acceleration is equal to null). So, the completed classical mechanics is
nothing but one law establishing the well-defined causal effect relation
between the force acting on the body and alteration of its speed
(acceleration). Not only people
beginning from the great antiquity knew this relation and could use it throwing
stones, sticks and other objects into prey and enemies. This relation is even
known to monkeys. Especially this relation was no secret for ancient carriers
of cargoes by rivers and seas. In case of doubts the reader himself can moor
the boat to a pier without consideration of inertia. We even don not say about the attention that the ancient soldiers
paid to missile weapons. All this
knowledge was used by the antique investigators in their work, who introduced
meaning of force and speed and Aristotle specified for physics and mathematics the
meaning of infinitesimal motion for infinitesimal time. Here we don’t consider
the works of Chinese scientists (it is known that Mo Ching in III century B.C.
had approached to dynamics) only in view of limitation
of sources. Islamic scientists were the following on time
researchers of dynamics. «The organic laws of mechanics stated by Isaakom
Newton (1643-1727), have been in detail described in works of Ibn Siny
(980-1037), Fahraddin ar-Rasi (1149-1209) and Hibatallah al-Bagdadi (mind.
1165)» [7].
In view of strong backlog in literacy Europe was initiate to the
decision of problems of dynamics for many centuries later, already after
development of the Islamic heritage grasped in territory of modern Spain. It is
known [8] that to Leonardo de Vinchi (1452 – 1519) and J. Benedetti, almost
have completely understood with an inertia problem, applying it to a scientific
explanation of acceleration of the body motion. Galileo Galilee demonstrated by
experimentally that in mechanical motion the force is the cause of the body
acceleration and what is proportionally to what in this process. Directly the
law of inertia itself was formulated firstly by R. Descarte in his work
“Principles of philosophy” [8].
The results of experiments of Galilee published previously made such
conclusion expected. And together they
paid the way of the critical relation of physics and mathematics that I. Newton proved and applied in practice.
So, what did Newton make? He did not
discover physical law F=m*a,
which was established
by absolutely other authors by an experimental way long before it. Why, all properties and laws of the nature can be learnt only from the nature by means of supervision of
it or experiments with it, but Newton did do neither one thing,
nor another and did not give references on made
by someone another. Namely
the nature is a source of all information on it, including that which is
expressed by formulas. But Newton connects this formula,
at that time well-known, with mathematics through the differential calculus
invented by him and in fact he obtained the fundamental equations of motion
(differential form of law F=m*a), which gave the true direction to
development of mechanics and other physics.
Now these great equations are formulated by the following way:
(1)
where i = 1, 2, … N, and i – number of
the minimal substance element which is named conditionally as a material
particle, mi are masses, Xi – coordinates, Fi
– the resultant of all forces acting upon the element.
Isaac Newton (1673 –
1727)
Let’s return to Newton again. Equations (1) are simple only by sight. In
reality it is not so because they include the new (for that time) mathematical
operator such as a double time derivative.
And this invention is not worth a pin unless the inverse integration
operator is presented on a silver platter. The work of Newton named
“Mathematical Principles of natural philosophy” [9] is devoted basically to
introduction of the operation of integration using various examples from mechanics
and astronomy where he calculates areas constrained with curved lines
thoroughly through any trapeziums and rectangles. Newton makes discovery by
discovery particularly in mathematics. And he does not confuse it with physics
but separates. And the boundary passes through the system of the data transfer:
from the side of physics – this is the nature laws and from the side of
mathematics and only
mathematics – already known formulas from physics, which are named by Newton as
(mathematical) axioms. Usually the entrance data in the mathematics is called
differently, but we can agree with Newton's terminology and keep for them the
name as "axioms" [9]. However
thus we should not forget that Newton did not open physical laws, it took
already known. Thus, Newton loaded by axioms only the mathematics and
out of bounds of Aristotle's physics did not leave.
It means that none of sciences has been disturbed: physics has no axioms or postulates but all begins
only from the experiment, and mathematics has no experiment with material
objects (after all, this is not science of a substance but the concentrated
logic), but there is
input data or the axioms, known to the person from other sources.
Let's note here one more physical law, which
Newton used, without having given references in the work on a source. Except
dynamics law (F=m*a) such is the universal gravitation law, the priority
on which opening is fixed for Robert Hooke (1635 – 1703) by the missive in
royal academy. Basically Newton also has not been obliged to refer to all these
physical laws as he wrote work on the mathematics («Mathematical Principles
…»), instead of on the physics of type of "Physics" or something
similar. In his interpretation
these laws were simply already known facts in the physics, which are axioms in
relation to mathematics as we have discussed above. Some mess has occurred only
then because of erroneous interpretation of its works by some tendentious
descendants, which are
confused between sciences, raking up all in one heap deliberately or simply
because of weakness of knowledge.
So, the
first and great lie in the physics is connected with great Newton and is
constructed on his name. It contains the statement that the first scientific
miracle has occurred to Newton, and he has discovered (has concocted,
postulated etc.) exclusively by means of mysterious inspiration physical laws
of inertia (F=m*a) and universal gravitation. Further still will be
worse and most discreditably.
From the equations of motion the laws of conservation of energy and
impulse are derived by only mathematical way giving rise to thermodynamics and
statistical physics. On base of equations of motion (1) the aero- and
hydrodynamics, astronomy and other sciences are built up. Cases of failures to
carry out these equations have not been found out so we also can use them
studying any motions of substance including all kinds of field naturally.
Further there is electrodynamics.
Electrodynamics
originates from connection opening between electric
and magnetic phenomena’s in the nature. This connection was found out for the
first time by practical consideration by Hans Christian Oersted (1777 – 1851).
In its experiments a current, proceeding through a wire, influenced a magnetic
needle nearby. Moreover, it has shown experimentally that influence has
vortical character round a wire. And it was already opening of an
electromagnetic induction. Ersted’s Ideas were picked up by the French
mathematician (!) Andre-Mari Amperes. It has experimentally shown that
co-operate not only a current with a magnet, but also two coils with a current
without presence of the magnet. And only errors directed by experiments have
prevented it to make following opening.
Michael
Faraday
(1797 – 1867)
English
physicist-experimenter Michael Faraday well knew about these experiments and opening.
He has picked up in
time relay race and has developed these ideas further in the experiments, which
have led to opening already the generation of electric currents by a variable
magnetic field. Here is how about it is written in «the Course of history of
physics» P.S.Kudryavtsev [10].
«Then Faraday has
received induction actions by means of ordinary magnets. Faraday named these
phenomena a magneto-electric induction. Ôàðàäåé considered that the
conductor which is exposed to induction influence from outside of other current
or a magnet, is in a special condition which he named electrotonic. This name
was not kept in a science, but research of a Faraday’s role of medium in
electromagnetic interactions from here has begun.
It is essential that Faraday, marking variable character of process of an
induction, speak about «the induced wave of an electricity». Several months
later, on March 12th, 1832, he fixed result of the supervision over
a temporality of the induction phenomena in the special letter entitled «the
new views which are subject now to storage in the sealed envelope in archives
of the Royal society». In this remarkable letter, which has been found out in
archives only later of 106 years, i.e. in 1938, absolutely certain conclusion
contains, «that on distribution of magnetic interaction time is required» that
action of one magnet on another «extends from magnetic bodies gradually and for
the distribution demands certain time». Faraday specifies, «that the electric
induction extends in precisely the same way», and considers «possible to apply
the theory of fluctuations to distribution of an electric induction». Process
of distribution of an induction is similar «to fluctuations of an uneasy water
table or on sound fluctuations of particles of air». Faraday writes that he
would like to check up the ideas experimentally, but in view of employment has
decided to transfer the letter to storage to assign to itself opening fixed
date. He specifies that «now, as far as I know, anybody from scientists, except
me, has no similar views».
The Faraday’s intuition is amazing, it have allowed he soon
after opening of an electromagnetic induction to come to idea of
electromagnetic waves. It is absolutely right, including this idea extremely
important and confirming the priority in the special letter, dated exact date».
Apparently, Faraday has realized magnitude of that
physical reality which he has opened. He even has started to generalize
intuitively all these stunning facts. Faraday has introduced for this
successfully in practice of the description and interpretation electric and
magnetic fields the evident device of power lines. It already was the step not
of the experimenter, but the theorist. However, unfortunately, the way to this
area has been closed to he further without special mathematical preparation. To
continue business should there was a genius of absolutely other warehouse and
specialization.
Other great physicist has
appeared in this role. He already had for this purpose the big arsenal of
mathematical knowledge and practice. His name is James
Clerk Maxwell. The richest experiment of the theorist in the field of
research of physical processes from streams of liquids and gases to
cross-section waves in the elastic medium has allowed he to use analogies in
the mathematical description of the most different physical phenomena.
So in work «About Faraday’s
power lines» [11] Maxwell write:
«By means of such analogies
I have tried to present those mathematical receptions and formulas which are
necessary for studying of the electric phenomena in the convenient form. My
method is identical with what adhered Faraday in the researches and which
though and mathematical interpretation of prof. Thomson is given it, etc.,
still often enough consider as less strict, than the methods used by
mathematicians-experts. From my statement, I hope, it will be clearly visible
that I do not aim to establish any physical theory in that area of a science in
which I have not made almost any experiment, and I have intention only to show,
how direct application of ideas and Faraday’s methods is better mutual
relations of various classes of the phenomena opened by him can be sorted out».
Let's notice that then he
all the same has constructed the theory. But it was result of generalization
and interpretation of the formulas deduced by analogy. It is a question of those empirical formulas, which Oersted, Ampere and
Faraday has established unequivocally prior to he.
James Clerk Maxwell (1831 – 1879)
Maxwell used in works not only a Faraday’s technique of power
lines, but weigh actual material with results of experiments and their
descriptions. In a Fig. 2 two schemes of the transformer in author's execution
of Faraday and Maxwell are presented.
Fig. 2
Here we see that the basic
difference between them is not present. Both there and there are represented
input and output (at Faraday from left to right, at Maxwell – on the contrary)
windings and the core between them. The core, by the way, was sometimes
excluded from the device, and effects remained. Faraday has invented and has
comprehensively studied experimentally this transformer. On it he investigated
connections between an electricity and magnetism, showed dynamics of their
mutual transformations of one in another. The same device, anyhow, always was
meant in Maxwell’s reasoning’s.
Logic of research of the
spatial structures, collected from such interconnected transformers, and
concept decoding "an electrotonic" condition, which has entered into
use of Faraday, have led of Maxwell to the strict mathematical formulation of
the law of an electric induction. And already through an induction of Maxwell
has come to the well-known equations of his name in the integrated form [12]:
, (2)
where E, H –
intensity electric and magnetic water, and D = ee0E and B = mm0H are corresponding to an induction,
j is density of currents.
Now correctness of the equations (2) it is easily
possible to check up and confirm by simple experiment in a school class on a
small little table.
Further was a trick. Having
transformed integrals in (2) on a contour to superficial, Maxwell
[12] has deduced the system of the differential equations, which been named by
Maxwell’s name. In modern interpretation these equations look so [13, 14]:
. (3)
Here full derivatives
in the left parts of the equations can be changed on privates if the entire
mediums are motionless, because 
where U is speed of medium or its any part.
The modern reader familiar with
formulas of the vector analysis finds easily in Maxwell’s calculations
corresponding equivalents and consequently perceives its logic without special
difficulties. However long time it was not so. For example L.Boltsman has
written so in notes to [11]:
«… who could start with a light
heart transfer of Maxwell’s language, original and the extremely interesting to
the expert, but infinitely difficult for a beginner, the language eulogized, on
the one hand, as inaccessible sample of the compressed both witty statement,
and blamed – with another, for difficulties of its understanding?»
Possibly,
the matter is that Maxwell after Faraday thought àbout electrodynamics by very large categories, and tried to make
indulgence to the reader and split up them on smaller, selecting
sometimes-different interpretations.
Formulas (2) are the fundamental
equations of electrodynamics. They are the bases of this science. They support
Maxwell’s generalization of conceptions of magnetic and electric fields
introduced previously by M. Faraday up to the level of the unified
electromagnetic field as new and independent kind of matter that is able to
exist independently both in free space and any material medium.
Along with equations of electrodynamics the
additions in form of formulas from electro- and magnetostatics are frequently
used:
div D = re , div B = rh , (4)
where re and rh are densities of electric and magnetic
charges. As independent magnetic charges have not been found yet, usually it is
assumed that rh =0. And static formulas rot E = 0 and
rot H = j are already included in (3) with D and B,
independent from time (static condition).
In
essence all theoretical electrodynamics is nothing but solution of the system
of equations (2), (3) with any original and boundary conditions and practical
electrodynamics is verification of these solutions and use of them in practice.
Its consequences lie in the bases of electrical engineering, communication
systems, a radar-location, spectroscopy, and circuitry of computers. All laws
of optics are proved by decisions the equations (3) and (4). Many other
branches of techniques and knowledge, which have though any relation to an
electricity and magnetism, are based too on decisions of these equations. They
influence also our understanding of the Nature. For example, the equations (4)
not only allow to understand the mechanism of excitation of fields by charges,
but also to calculate return process – the formation of constant charges in
nonlinear mediums by a variable electromagnetic field.
Five equations (1),
(3) and (4) comprise (are handled analytically in the strict mathematical form)
all fundamental Nature laws, known to us, in the sense that the scientific
justifiability of other new laws discovered before and being discovered flows
from these laws and is grounded by them. For example, Bernulli’s law flows from
hydrodynamics, which is derived from equations (1). Calculations of hypersonic
flows demand for additional information from physical chemistry and plasma. But
they also are in sphere of influence of the fundamental laws of Nature. All gas
laws (laws of state and thermodynamics) are doubled and specified by
statistical physics (remember the distributions of Maxwell and Gibbs) based on
the law of conservation of energy flowing from equations (1). Al laws of optics
are justified by solutions of equations (3) and (4). Gravitation and quantum
forces are also the result of solution of these fundamental equations [1] (more
detail information see below). This list can be continued.
In addition to the
strict empirical base, equations (1), (3) and (4) have the other common
feature: they connect forces and laws of motion i.e. the cause and the
consequence closed direct and clear relations while only in separate natural
phenomena. And to obtain the general picture of substance structure it is
necessary either to seek their common solution specifying boundary and original
conditions from the experiment or to seek experimentally the additions to these
equations with new forces unknown to science if such forces appear by any way.
Unfortunately, they have not appeared yet, and Nature has not gone beyond the
first case so far.
Therefore the equations (1), (3) and (4) at least now,
i.e. before the opening of new real (not hypothetical and not fantastic)
forces, should describe and actually describe all known phenomena of the
nature. If new laws - new, still unknown
forces and their connections with movements - are ever open, they will be added to
already known laws describe by the equations (1), (3) and (4) necessarily in
additive form. As all forces are
additive by their nature, and each other do not destroy, but are summarized.
Now we should say separately about mathematics as formal logic.
Mathematics is not physics to any extent and even it is not a part of
physics. These sciences have principally different object of investigation:
Nature – for Physics and logic of numerical operations – for Mathematics. It is
naturally that the tools of investigations of these objects are different either.
Only observations and experiments are the source of knowledge for Physics.
Mathematics operates with the known information, which is prepared before by
anybody and presented in form of axioms or postulates. So formulas and massive
of numbers, for example, known economical data, a text for translation into the
other language, idea of a cartoon film, physical laws and others are
preassigned.
Therefore, mathematics is not physics but it is the most important tool
for searching the logical consequences flowing from the fundamental equations
of physics among the others. It is naturally that mathematics is developing
constantly. Here is the opinion of a scientist and a teacher formulated in the
beginning of the textbook [15]: “This book specifies some aspects of physical
theories of field and substance considered as objects of the calculus
mathematics. … Due to computers the number returned to mathematics. Today with
computers we can solve practically any single problems. Nevertheless,
mathematics is the numerical model of the world. And if Newton had had a
computer he maybe would not have invented differential calculus.”
So, the ideology of
Aristotle and his followers only for 16 centuries took out physics from the
blind alley of myths, prejudices and false speculative theories. Then, several
generations of genial physics specified by experimentally such fundamental laws
of nature to which the theorists could apply the laws of mathematical logic. In
result, unprecedented expansion of knowledge on substance and its motion has
been achieved that is in essence the sole purpose of physics as science.
Physics of 20th
and beginning of 21st centuries
Fast accumulation of
experimental discoveries by the beginning of 20th century caught the theory unawares.
Especially it refers to the state if electrodynamics. Maxwell’s theory only
continued its formation, was very difficult in sense of the intuitive
interpretation and so it was suspect. The situation in this field of
theoretical physics was complicated by mathematical calculus problems, which
are connected with cumbrous methods of solutions of equations of mathematical
physics. Surprisingly, but after G.Gertz's death seriously there was nobody to
be engaged in electrodynamics. Speculations about this part of physics are
passed current faster as knowledge’s. Some data from an electrostatics of the
thousand-year prescription like of the Coulomb’s law helped very little and
that is even worse, made false impression about full literacy of researchers.
Therefore by the time of
discovery of elementary particles and quantum characteristic of their
interaction with an electromagnetic field (Max Planck in 1900) physics could be
armed only by mechanics and mathematics adopted to mechanics. Certainly, these
means was insufficiently. But there was still the worst: new theorists have
ignored the complete and full mechanics for convenience of calculations. They
took from it only one final chapter about potential systems, which contains the
specifically simplified formalism of Hamilton. However potential systems in the
nature are not present. And it has made a situation around new problems
theoretically absolutely hopeless.
The
theorists, who did not know the principles of electrodynamics and knew
mechanics only within one not the most successful chapter, could not answer
reasonably on questions asked by experiments. Their obvious
confusion has not passed by attention of adventurers, which did not know laws
of physics and were not going to study. They have quickly changed a science for
unlimited mysticism, i.e. have revived that ancient ideology of Magizm. For example, the problem of
radiation and absorption of electromagnetic energy by substance has been
dislodged immediately out from physics by absurd dogma of Magizm about absurd
bifurcation ("dualism") of the Nature, which is ostensibly filled
simultaneously by electromagnetic waves and photon flies too. It is
clear that after such general profanation the question on interaction of
elementary particles through an electromagnetic field has lost any sense.
In reality, the true
materialistic answers on questions of the experimenters were not far but near.
Physicists have not paid attention to Gustav Mie's decision of a problem about scattering
of electromagnetic waves of light on spheres, which are fair for all possible,
the relation of diameter to length of a wave [16, 17]. It was the first exact
research of interaction of real extraneous electromagnetic field with real own
exterior field of material object. Naturally, sets of experiments only have proved
this certainly correctly solution. Thus it has been strictly proved that own external types of
electromagnetic waves at any particles are strictly determined, as well as
waves in hollow resonators. The interference of these own fields finally
also defines all their electromagnetic, gravitational and other properties.
Gustav Mie (1868 - 1957)
In fact it was sufficiently only to compare
honestly the new experimental data with properties of electromagnetic field and
immediately all details of quantum and gravitation interaction became clear.
For example, in Fig. 3 taken from the book [1] the forces acting among the
groups of elementary particles depending on distance between them have been
demonstrated.
Here in different scales the followings is
presented: F – full force of interaction (its quantum character is
specified by oscillation), Ff –
averaging force, responsible for gravitation and W~ – variable part of full
energy of the system. And this all is obtained without the “models”,
postulates, naive hypotheses and other revelations. It is sufficient to have
the experimental data and equations (3) and (4) (details see [1]). After that
the prospects for explanation of substance structure were opened.
However physicists were late to take this step.
Natural combining of equations (1) (3) and (4) with quantum physics and theory
of gravitation was not observed. Very clear and harmonious structure of the
entire material world, beginning from the elementary particles to molecules,
genomes of living organisms and galaxies was left in sphere of mysteries and
intentional speculations. And it happened so because the fussy impostors took
away physics from scientists and drove it in the precipice of Magizm. Science
crashed down to the prehistory level.
Fig. 3
It
turned out that the true scientists became thoughtful at that time, it is able
to say, and they took time-out at the wrong time at all. It happened just at
the moment when science became more and more professional and brought the
dividends to scientists both in form of prestige and by cash. Naturally, nature
abhors a vacuum and the niche was filled by frank impostors as if new
scientists without of analytical and creative inclinations in principle.
Question: how the people who do not know electrodynamics, were going to study
interaction of electromagnetic radiation with substance? The answer: but in no
way! After all it is impossible to describe jogging, without having concept
that such a track and feet. Pseudo-scientists have simply taken advantage of
confusion and instead of nature studying they were occupied with “mental
experiments” with “mental” fantastic totems, which were called as “models”.
(Still an example: whether it is possible to find a splinter in the real heel,
examining only heel model? Or, and how to diagnose a man’s heart trouble by the
cardiogramm of a cat or a monkey as model?) At that, the substitution of the
object was realized so artistically that most viewers did not understand at all
what happened. Physics as science of Nature dropped out of sight fully. It was
replaced with system of loudly discussed ridiculous dogmas, which only parody
physics, have deprived of its status of the real science. Result: the
pseudo-physics have triumphed, and not very competent viewers stiffened in
astonishment for whole 100 years.
But such "physics"
is not already a science, it something absolutely other. Even the word of
"false-physics" characterizes this surprising phenomenon only rather
approximately.
Having at
itself before eyes such obvious pseudoscientific forgery and absolutely cynical
celebration of New Magizm, we should ask a question: how elementary ignorance
could so effectively to suppress human collective mind? Or, how primitive
heating at play could turn literally to outlook, overriding a fair and strict
science the physics? One short answer to such questions probably is not
present. But we can conduct initial research of a problem. For these purposes
we will allocate three basic aspects of a problem: psychological, philosophical
and political.
Let's consider each aspect
separately.
Psychological roots of New
Magizm
Above we have seen, how very
complicated by the nature the human consciousness is easily cracked by
sincerely fanatical or simply mercenary preachers of Magizm. However, any swindlers operate under the similar
scheme. Such primary and historically checked up deceit is possible only from
the consent and an oncoming traffic of the nature of mental process of the
person. And in this business as we have found out at research of problems of
"dualism" [1], a weak place is the system of formation and check of
hypotheses.
People
can plan. And for this purpose them interested always at least rough estimates
of their performance prospects, which we name as hypotheses. So the
consciousness of the person faces a problem of forecasting of events on the
basis of the known facts. The scientific process passes same way. As a result
all ways guides to a field of activity of intuition and logic, and always with
the big set of the most different components of an actual material. However for
purposeful work with the facts the consciousness requires their preliminary
structurization – they should be built into system, to group, to clean
obviously false, to reduce repetitions etc.
The
mechanism of sorting or of ordering of all fragments of that material for
intuition, which consists of a set of the facts, their causes, ethno-sciences and preconceptions, is based more often on the uniform concept checked
up by centuries as God. It is
accepted by the obvious that God created this world,
and He has allocated this world by these properties, which He self has shown us. And any
«Peculiar People» cannot in any case to change these properties – it is simple
outside of its competence. In sense: incantations with sorcery, or crafty
postulates with "models", or conjurations, or the paid public
relations with Nobel Prizes together are powerless all in this business. Here the
main thing is that the primary position should not suppose doubts in an
objective reality of creation of God or the Nature. We should recognize also a
reality and severity of laws which they to us open.
However in any case without
the incipient ordering the hypotheses world becomes fragmentary, and, hence,
prepared for perception of Magizm. It turns out so that the chaos in
consciousness gives rise to Magizm, and itself Magizm eats out of this chaos and chaos strengthens it. The vicious circle
becomes closed, and any science loses actuality.
So,
knowledge process includes two stages: structurization of the initial
(aprioristic) information or simply known facts and work with these structures
by already checked up scientific methods of logic or statistics. At the first
stage are possible abusing by imaginations and a juggling by the facts.
Therefore it also is a key place of intervention of charlatans from Magizm.
I.e. Magizm destroys a logic chain of knowledge in the initial stage, blocking
an objective scientific stage. And in it is a secret of its efficiency (*).
Let's consider as deformity illustration of
Magizm its most amusing problem about “grand unification” of all forces, which
do not exist in the Nature. It is a question about the "model" of
Nature, in which such forces, which anybody never found out, operate; i.e.
those fantastic forces operate, which introduction makes no sense and reason.
But this problem has been set up. And its absurdity has been covered by a
following gate: sorcery has demanded, that absent forces, which will unite,
were necessarily potential, i.e. such which in the Nature cannot be even
basically. It means that the fantastic problem is put twice; it is a problem
with a double guarantee of unreality. But also it is not enough of it. All this
nonsense has also the third barrier of defense. It is created by censorship. If
three obstacles will seem too few for obscurantists all the same they will
think up ten more. For example, they can distract attention to any one more
ridiculous "model" from the world of insects etc. Obscurantists do
not deal with a reality, but in the supposed world of imaginations all is
possible. The main thing for Magizm was and there is one: to detain process of
the human reasoning in the first, chaotic stage, not to admit a science to the decision of scientific problems.
(*) So we in passing answer a
question: and why New Magizm so often maintains atheism? Because the atheism
source is not experiment, but revelation. Hence, atheism is not a science, but
religion, and far from monotheism, but very close to Magizmu. They are near
relations. For this reason secretly believing pseudo-physicists name themselves
more often atheists.
But here
also vulnerability of Magizm is clear. People through any time understand a
deceit and try to be pulled out from its captivity.By this time the deceiver
should run away or to hide under protection of censorship of the new
inquisitor, having justified sense of its existence. So Magizm will organize
the uniform block with inquisition parasitizing on one deceit. And we see the
chain tested by much centuries: a reason and a deceit plan → Magizm +
inquisition → tinned lie. On it the first stage of cognitive process begins
and comes to an end, blocking access for scientists to a science
and culture.
Let's pay attention to
organizational structure of supporters of New Magizm, this new pagan order.
Ahead authors of jokes about physics go. The group, which praises the first, is
located behind them. A system of those who hands over awards (quartermasters)
is further. Inquisitors and the investor with a bag of silvers close the
system. This order reminds a system of the Teutonic knights, called
"pig". But it is located on the contrary – a bum forward to hide
Fuhrers. Naturally, here places for scientists are absent.
Now
it is appropriate mention of balance of the true knowledge combined by the
conception of physics and the sum of prejudices being the essence of the
dogmatic false physics. These integral parts of human consciousness are
interdependent very much because the principle of fullness of persuasions acts
against people’s will at the subconscious level as we already noted during
analysis of causes of dualism in science [1]. The total sum of knowledge of a
physic + knowledge of a false physic = S where S is a certain constant.
Occasional deviations (fluctuations) of this value upward are forgotten due to
redundancy and insufficiency is compensated mandatorily by stress with additions
of legends from false physics.
Fig. 4
Therefore, the graphs of
development of physics and false physics shall be symmetrical in relation to
line S/2. This allows us to use the special points of both lines for general correction
of process. For example, during making up the original graph in Fig.1 it was
difficult to say about the level of drop of physics in period IV. Now according
to the fact that the false physics returned to the prehistoric level
(comparison table is presented in point «New
paganism and system crisis» of
this work) it is possible to assert the level of physics dropped almost up to
0.
Taking into
account the mentioned above, the graph of change of physics and false physics
for the concerned 3000 years is presented in Fig. 4. In this figure it is seen
very well how slowly with great difficulty and in searching physics broke loose
from the prison of mystics and ignorance. Prejudices hold it strongly in state
of pseudo-religion. And only integration of philosophy with physical experiment
pulled out science from the captivity of shamans and priests. It was required only three hundred years to Physics to open
fundamental laws of the Nature and safely to look in the future.
However the science celebration lasted
not so long. Experiment with pseudo-physics in 20th century has
shown the price of «creativity freedom» in a science about the Nature. And full
or partially the way to clearing of mind from religious and any other
discipline has been passed up to full madness already in the beginning of this
gloomy century. Freedom were not absolutely: Magizm
has found of its niche and was again set up on the pedestal by means of
censorship in means of the scientific and mass information. Absolutised,
deprived of any logic, of ethical and religious borders the vulgar materialism
has jumped into opposite phase and now has
destroyed itself.
It is
remarkable that new inquisitors have made a fool even of Englishmen so that
they have forgotten about the great physicists and, having lost national
dignity and pride, have started glorification of the cynical money-changers,
which think out ridiculous jokes about physics and physicists.
Magizm has returned.
Philosophical turn
Only at first
sight the reader can be surprised, how much fast there was a falling of a
modern science to wild prehistoric level. It has appeared that all is very
simple. High speed of process was defined first by destruction of all
philosophies of physics by rascals who have grasped to the physicist.
Look closely at this problem
more attentively.
About philosophy from
Aristotle to Thomas Aquinas we said above. Turn to the modern philosophy.
Mainly it is positivism but at the last stage it is post-positivism and postmodernism.
That’s what Olga Nikolaevna Strelnik [18] writes about post-positivism on this
occasion (p.117):
«So, in concept of I.
Lakatos the idea of scientific character stops being associated only with
strict formally logical standards. The problem of isolation of scientific
knowledge from unscientific one takes new character. For solution of this
problem it is necessary to address to the meaningful criteria, which are not a
priori (pre-experimental) and change with the knowledge development.
Within the frames of
post-positivism it is proposed more radical conception of scientific character.
Its author P. Fayrabend denies the rationality of science in full. According to
P. Fayrabend the standards of scientific character and rationality change not
only from epoch to epoch but from one scientist to the other one. The scientist is occupied with propaganda of
his theory by the same way as the politician propagandizes any ideology ….
Therefore, development of science and scientific activity are irrational fully.
The science being understood by this way transforms into one of forms of
ideology, loses intension for obtaining of objective knowledge and rational
character, (marked out by us as example of justification of ignorance of the
amateur taking up the scientific or academic post not for learning but
according to the “selected” nationality or for servile personal services
rendered to the chief).
Obviously, the conception of
P. Fayrabend reflecting some particulars of development of scientific knowledge,
nevertheless, leads to the mistaken conclusion on irrationality of science.
Indeed, the science pretending to have the sole correct method and give the
sole true knowledge is transformed into the kind of ideology. However, not all
science is the same. Transformation of the ideal of scientific character in
XXc. led to the fact that the scientific character is not considered any more
as an absolute truth, the science do not pretend to take a central place in
culture and by this way it keeps specificity of its content and methods of
functioning. The science is a tool in hands of a man having restriction for
application but not a sole sense and purpose of cultural activity.
So, the attempt to find
unique formally-logical criteria of scientific character and to reconstruct the
history of science as absolutely rational process leads to conclusion on
irrationality of the science itself. The investigators face with the paradox
when they should recognize availability of unscientific and irrational things inside
the scientific itself. The problem is connected with the fact that
neo-positivism and critical rationalism contain the attempt of identity of
scientific character with the strict correspondence with deductive logical
procedures (marked out by us: correspondence with the object of knowledge is
out of the question!). However, neither context of discovery of the theory nor
context of its justification is brought only to the deductive procedures. In
the real scientific investigation there are elements that do not meet the stiff
formally logical scheme. So the questions of isolation of the scientific
knowledge from unscientific one it is impossible to solve supporting only on
the logical criteria. However, richness of content of criteria of scientific character
does not cancel the fact of existence of a special kind of knowledge called as
scientific which can be isolated from the other kinds of knowledge according to
the whole row of parameters and does not exclude the use of procedures of
verification and falsification”.
Below there is the last word
of fashion from the same book (p.47):
«Postmodernism as a
philosophic tendency was formed during the last ten years of XXc. and is a
modern variant of relativity and skepticism. … Postmodernism provides radical
criticism of the Western logocentrist philosophic tradition that is seeking the
order, the origin, the essence everywhere and so on refusing to the brain the
right to specify the valuables, to reveal the truth, to define the limits and
to set the rules. The principle of
rationality the postmodernists consider as the result of “imperialism of
intellect” limiting spontaneity of work of mind and imagination.
Post-modernism uses the
themes previously considering as prohibited or non-philosophic (death, madness,
sex and others) to say about culture in a new fashion. Considering the reality
as a set of different sign models and insisting on randomness of connection
between the sign and the meaning, postmodernism refuses from the idea of
objectivity. The reality with which the man deals has the semantic sign nature
when the signs mean no objects but the other signs.
Postmodernism refuses from
understanding the truth as being discovered and offers the idea of the truth
being created in a new fashion every time. The truth depends on the language in
which the person speaks and the language itself is a creation of a human being.
… Personality is not considered any
more as integrity and unity being expressed in feeling of “the ego”. Every person is variety of “the egos”,
variety of senses being crossed or not being crossed, conflicting or not
conflicting between each other. As there is no distinctness and uniqueness in
the external so there is no distinctness in the internal. Personality is
pluralistic and all so called “high valuables” are fictions created by mind for
purpose to divert the person from the life itself. The problem of philosophy according to the postmodernists is
interpretation of the existing and new created meanings which are absolutely
equal in rights, because there are no the highest and more worthy and the
lowest unworthy meanings. Reality is uniform in this plan.
... . Postmodernism completes development of western philosophy
of XX c., drawing conclusions on base of postclassical criticism of mind”.
How such a combative
philosophy of destruction of common sense and mind can help to scientific
physics? It is very effective by the same way as the philosophy of incendiary
Erostratus – the temple of Artemis the masters built for many tens of years but
a fool burnt it for one night.
And «skepticism» is not more
than coquetry in the manner of Eugeny Onegin i.e. it is such a trick to move to
pity, to try to wake maternal feelings of a lady, … .
However,
whether the primitive idea of negation of human experiment, mind and their
application in practice is worthy of such congestion of philosophies and
philosophers? Whether it is possible to tell about it easier? It appears it is
possible. Here the citation from work in general of in any way not
well-educated Shandor LaVey [19]:
«…all
the "great works" on the subject of magic, are nothing more than
sanctimonious fraud - guilt-ridden ramblings and esoteric gibberish by
chroniclers of magical lore unable or unwilling to present an objective view of
the subject. Writer after writer, in efforts to state the principles of
"white and black magic", has succeeded instead in clouding the entire
issue so badly that the would-be student of sorcery winds up stupidly pushing a
planchette over a Ouija board, standing inside a pentagram waiting for a demon
to present itself, limply tossing I-Ching yarrow stalks like so many stale
pretzels, shuffling pasteboards to foretell a future …
The true magus knows that
occult bookshelves abound with the brittle relics of frightened minds and
sterile bodies, metaphysical journals of self-deceit, and constipated
rule-books of Eastern mysticism. Far too long has the subject of Satanic magic
and philosophy been written down by wild-eyed journalists of the right-hand path.»
Well, here
now all is clearer. The main Magus and Satanist has explained what is what. It
emerged that the resolute turn of culture back in
Magizm and to devildom unmasks itself so, what even at first frightens. Therefore postpositivists and postmodernists have
confused all since terribly were frightened. Pseudo-physicists, who from
illiteracy have drawn the mysticism into a science, have frightened them so
that those have lost completely logic still 100 years ago. Primitive Satanism (it is possible to read: usual Magizm), which has
confused philosophers, does not allow coming round and now. Now even the question is pertinent: and whether there
is in general such profession – the frightened philosopher?
By this way
we found the cause of historically momentary destruction of natural history and
physics. This cause was hidden in the intentional profanation of philosophy in
particularity and all science as a whole through the principal refuse from
searching the truth in classical sense.
However, 100
years are the big duration, at least, for such grandiose and mass leg pulling.
Whether it is possible to name this record stability of error casual? Really
people have thyself refused knowledge of objective laws of the nature and have
wallowed in the boundless mysticism? A key to the answer is rigid censorship in
means of the scientific and mass information. Errors are not protected by
censorship. It is already a policy.
So we gradually came from
normal physics as part of normal natural history to the dying or dead form of
that – to the dogmatic political physics of the 20th and 21st
centuries.
Well then, politics is
politics.
Physics was born in
conglomeration of historical processes of titanic scales on background of which
the modern politics does not look like mysterious or even considerable.
That
the policy does in the physics
So, now we have to put the physics
itself aside and to try to understand such routine as arguments and approaches
to the political component of the modern false physics. Certainly,
we here were not going to politicize in the general understanding. It
interests us only as the concrete tool for formation of massive deception in physics and the
following deception keeping by force. But, as always, there are also
unintentional opening in the neighborhoods to a research theme.
New Magizm
does not differ by ideologically from the Old One having made stupid the people
for about 40000-50000. However, the form and methods of the propaganda have
been modernized a little but not so complicatedly that they cannot be
investigated by simple and clear approaches from the classical physics. After
all, these methods have proved their reliability to people in case of
clarification of causes of any phenomena and connection of these causes with
consequences. This is very simple.
Aristotle suggested searching the causal effects through observations. And G.
Galilei supplemented this process with the target tests (throwing the stones).
At first we place New Magizm in the field
of classical supervision in accordance with Aristotle as he recommended for a
physics science.
Examples
of supervision are presented lower.
Observation ¹1
L.D. Landau and Å.Ì. Lifshits started
textbook «Theory of field» [2] by the following way: «Complete logically
connected theory of electromagnetic field includes the special theory of
relativity”.
But what does this load statement mean?
Theory of electromagnetic field is the law
of nature (equations (3) above). The «special theory of relativity» is a
hypothesis (dream, day-dream, assumption) on constancy of velocity of light
i.e. that air castle with “models” and fetishes from which physics always
denies with all its might (see stage III in Fig. 1 and Fig. 3 in [1]). But how
can they be combined in one sentence? Doesn’t electrodynamics need in fantasies
and day-dreams? But, why?
If we try to find the evidences of
thoughts, meditations on causes and consequences (by Aristotle or other
philosopher s of physics) or to suspect hints at chains of casual effects in
Landau’s proclamation but to our surprise we won’t find them anywhere. They are
not available at all. There is
no mention of the studied object – Nature or about
supervision over it. And maybe
there is something delicate and complicated from the field of logical reasons
in favour of the strange Phrase in the base of the textbook. No, there is
nothing absolutely – only emptiness. Somehow suddenly out of connection with
something from this world this phrase-slogan has appeared. What does it mean? What tradition is it
from? It is from the same pagan traditions, from the field of conjurations in
Magizm. That’s why the explanations are not required. The false priest blurted
out and that’s all. He uttered without eye twinkling and we shall say it again
or the Nile will flow to the other direction or the Sun will go out.
Observation ¹2
The
same situation is with the magical “tensor” on which we wrote in [2].
Academician Okun introduced him to public as if this placard is so powerful, so
almighty that Zeus himself is unable to hold a candle to it. Is it thinkable
this simple amulet is a source of gravitation on the Earth and in the Galaxy.
And also there are no reasonable arguments in favor of the cardboard. There are
some manipulations with really wrong formulas but this is only as blind. The
main thing is providing that the Academician would be taken on trust again and
again. And with lamentations it is necessary to ask the Gods not to turn around
or to tear this placard by accident. Then – it is so terrible! – We won’t avoid
disasters not only with the Nile but and with mountains and with planets, i.e.
we see the primitive Magizm again.
Observation ¹3
As we
wrote before [2], textbook by L.D. Landau and Å.Ì. Lifshits on quantum mechanics
also started with the unusual approval of the “model” called as a planetary
atomic model. And now the essence is that instead of real nature quite a banal
primitive “model” has been thought which is provided by the authors with such
great power that as if cancels all known laws of Nature. It does not care
either mechanics, or electrodynamics, now as if these sciences were not
available at all. Further the students are put categorically the thought into that there is no sense to study Nature
you should study only the wonderful “model” which is much better and more
important than the Nature itself. Implantation of this speculation is going by
declaratively for the time present without any clear explanations and doubts.
Everything begins again from the loud statements – proclamations. New priests
suggest believing devotedly in these wild directions and coaxing their magician
Highnesses with hymns in glorification of the priest genius achieving such very
old invention of Magizm.
Observation ¹4
Let's look in Feynman's textbook [20] about
quantum electrodynamics, which should be engaged by the studying of interaction
of elementary particles with an electromagnetic field.
Here we read in the first lecture: «From set of possible forms the most convenient
form is representation of an electromagnetic field in the form of a aggregate of flat waves». And further this
method is put in a basis of calculations. However for a long time also it is
obviously known [17] that in a near zone at any absorbing, radiating and
reradiating objects, including and elementary particles, prevail longitudinal
waves of two types - magnetic and electric. And this fact is easy for checking
up direct measurements or the decision of Maxwell’s equations. But longitudinal waves have not something in common
with flat cross-section waves; they even are not similar in any way to these
flat waves. Therefore real waves cannot be
presented «in the form of a aggregate of flat waves». And we see, how
installation on studying of process, which is not present in the nature in
general, is again initially declared and firmly given. And that really closes
the way to research of interactions, which exist really.
The attentive reader can perform himself
tens of such observations and he always will meet the evidences of our four
observations.
Results of the 4 observations:
All
objects of our observances always have origins in unmotivated, perfidious,
obviously false declarations rejecting any argumentations in principle. Any
counter-evidences are nipped in the bud. Even the questions such as: “How could
the “model” cancel the law of Nature?” or “How can the “tensor” give birth to
gravitation?” – nobody can ask. Such people are swept aside primordially. As
a result the fair physicist is put before ostensibly come true fact. And the
taboo is imposed on any meditations to parry doubts.
So,
the main result of observations is:
The modern
Magizm acts in Physics not through persuasion but by forcible fooling starting
from the insolent unmotivated absolutely false declarations, which are issued
in the form of obviously false dogmas, of sorcery
formulas or conjurations.
As
we already have noticed above, all this nonsense has some psychological
preconditions in consciousness of not so competent people. But obviously it is
not enough so that system of impudent leaflets, which we find in textbooks, was
generated. After all the system of the coordinated actions for a deceit of
readers is visible in them. However creation of
such system requires priests and the most severe censorship in means of the
mass and scientific information. It means that very rigid political
organization, which does not differ on the structure from usual global devilish
sect, stands up for all that we have noticed above.
It
is easy to guess that here has not done without the latent political springs. Because it is the time
to say something about these political springs because they provide stability
and irrevocability of new Magizm by conservation of curriculums and plans i.e. create
them and send downward to the teachers controlling the eagerness in teaching of
such delirium with the wage. They stimulate and feed the braveness of the
priest of the new Magizm and suppress dissidence.
In short, here it is the real
politics. Finally, we will begin.
Politics is very shy and got used to
hiding itself from the observers’ intent stare. So for its revealing it is
little to have only curiosity (observance) the acts need because sometimes it
is enough to take the cover off (the experiment of the first type) and
sometimes it is useful to caress (the experiment of the second type) so that it
gets undressed itself. The physicists
call this now not as observance but as experiment (under Galilei) – the result
of the designed activity.
So,
we are compelled to make experiments in bureaucratic and media spaces about
physics. It is a question of correspondence from the Russian Academy of
Sciences, about the censorship analysis in the press and at physical forums,
and also about walks of Masonic and other mysticism atop sciences. And it is necessary to do it by the active means
through political experiments.. We already carried out such work and have
described in a blog, which is located to the address:
http://www.inauka.ru/blogs/article98128 , and on our site:
http://realphys.com/en/Phys_polit.htm .
Further
we represent only results of these experiments.
Firstly, these
experiments confirmed that we had already noticed during the observances (under
Aristotle). The fundamental logical
origin of all thoughts in the false physics that moved even to the simple office
work (correspondence) of the scientific officers is a sudden and openly
perfidious lie practiced as fundamental doctrine of New Magizm. We gave it the
name such as argument of YSIHE (You spit in his eye and he will reply it's just
dew from the sky) highlighting the special cynicism of these sly statements.
This tactics of the simply grotesque lie shocking by its impossibility from the
point of view of normal persons was invented not only now, and Gebbels also was
not its author. It was born very long ago, and as some authors believe it was
described even in the Deuteronomy of Old Testament. Politics used it very
actively in the beginning of 20th century as a new and irresistible argument
for fooling of the verdant listener. Now it is continuing to work in physics at
the level of naïve students and schoolboys. The main condition of success
of such tactics is removal of literate opponents and critics by any way.
Otherwise this crazy attempt is disclosed easily and ruined. So the priests of
New Magizm also transferred easily from any low act to open and sometimes
massive terror (see the History if the USSR where the accession to the throne
of the argument YSIHE required killing of 100 million citizens).
Secondly, we see the
censorship exceeded the limits of the separate country. It became total in the
international scale. In this sense Russia after such many shocks appeared as
the freest country as publication and sale of books in Russia is not
prohibited. In the other states of “the
free world” the situation is much worse.
For example, no one English-speaking
publishing house agreed to publish my books or brochures. No one foreign
Internet-shop accepted for sale my published book «Fundamental particles in
pictures and without hypothesis» [21].
Thirdly,
the principles of politics of «Judeo-Christian civilization» are tied with the
secret connections and organizations so that everything that is capable to
influence on the ideology of a modern person is under the total control. Into
the sphere of the secret and blind blockade the innocent physics fell.
Special place in
censorship and secret lie stimulations occupy Masonic organizations, which
direct the press and give out Nobel Prizes. In essence they are not absolutely
conspiracy organizations, definition more close approaches to them is
semi-secret. After all multi about them is known and from the open press. Besides, masons are strongly atomized
organizationally and spatially. Therefore they cannot
carry out function of the single coordinating or commanding center. But it exist, such center is with all patency.
Hence, masons hold, most likely, an average position and are
not initial part, but they are the extremely confused intermediate link in the same centralized system of a deceit. Their function is to hide and confuse traces. I.e. Masons not is the present secret censor who
orders all. They a shadow of this center, an executive office of that invisible
present staff, which purpose is mass leg-pulling of the population of all
planet.
So, we will formulate the main conclusion.
In essence just the policy finishes
the amalgamation of crowd of pagan prophets and authors of jokes about physics
into the branched and disciplined organizational structure of type of devilish
sect. And actually physics is only a victim or
one of victims of this policy.
By the way, here is how has commented on this case the
author of «The Satanic Bible» [19]:
«The old literature is the
by-product of brains festering with fear and defeat, written unknowingly for
the assistance of those who really rule the earth, and who, from their Hellish
thrones, laugh with noisome mirth».
And here
it is «reflections of mind», which did not suspect about Aristotle's existence
and of the equations of mathematical physics in general:
«The ravens of night have flown
forth to summon Loki, who hath set Valhalla aflame with the searing trident of
the Inferno. The twilight is done. A glow of new light is borne out of the
night and Lucifer is risen, once more to proclaim: "This is the age of
Satan! Satan Rules the Earth!" The gods of the unjust are dead. This is
the morning of magic, and undefiled wisdom».
3. Results and perspectives
New paganism and system crisis
The full return of the modern Physics to
Magizm demonstrates comparison of the signs of the stages of its development
shown in Table 1. These data
directly follow from the resulted above research.
|
System Sign |
Retro –false physics |
Physics
|
Neo- false physics
|
|
Philosophy |
Rudimentary pagan forms |
Aristotleizm + Thomasizm |
Positivism, neo- positivism, post- positivism, |
|
Subject of observance and impact |
Model
(Idol, totem,
plaster cast)
|
Nature
(Substance and its movement) |
Model
(Postulate,
hypothesis, principle)
|
|
Source of knowledge |
Revelation
|
Result of observances over the substance |
Revelation
|
|
Form of the learning process |
Myth creating |
Record and analysis of experimental results |
Myth creating, «The theory without contradictions» |
|
Criterion of the truth of the
statement |
Position (public position) of the
declaring person |
Experiment or its mathematical consequence |
Position (public position) of the declaring person |
|
Main scientific argument of the
officials |
Dogma YSIHE from the side of the priest or
shaman |
Compliance with the experiment or the empirical formula |
Dogma YSIHE from the side of heads of
“scientific schools or academicians” |
|
Attitude to censorship |
As to the basis for survival of servants of cult |
Negative |
As to the basis for
survival of false physicists
|
|
Management system |
Secret through the servants of cult and monarchs |
Open |
Secret through the masons,
censorship and system of bonuses only for false physics
|
|
Political purpose |
Keeping of status
–quo
|
Progress through the truth light |
Keeping of status
–quo
|
Table 1
From the analysis of Table 1 it is seen that
now we watch the full return of the physics into the old state. However, this
science fell under the influence of the integral and complicated system of
fooling by New Magizm almost by accidentally. We see only the episode in one
very large game occupied also politics, finances and economics. Crisis of
brains and victory of perfidious lie appeared in three forms.
Firstly, world outlook crisis takes place, which broke, as an
abscess, in the theoretical physics. It is connected with full loss of all natural
reference points in interpretation of lie concept. Indulgent and encouraging
installations of New Magizm, which in
20th century has merged very naturally with a frank Satanism, have
replaced them. Therefore it is easy to guess that someone has planned
for a long time already and has well set up by money and the vulgar Magizm with
rapt Satanism, and the venal censorship, which has superseded scientific ethics, and all
"crisis" of physics, conjointly.
Secondly, the
financial and economical crisis of “globalization” ripened around the country –
bankrupt with the debt more than 300% of its gross domestic product (GDP) which
according to “the parity of purchasing capacity is equal to about $60 trillion.
That is the American economics lives in the situation when almost all annual
world gross domestic product shall be returned for their debts» (ref. http://www.newsland.ru/News/Detail/id/83626/ ).
And due to absence of real (not Masonic) mass-media the
Americans even do not suspect that they have been brought to ruin in full and
that they have already no real way out. It is impossible to give back such debt
and they have been cleaned out fully.
Thirdly, we are
told about the democracy in the « Judeo-Christian civilization» but we find
something other through the history of the science – physics. Democracy is the
system of self-government of demos i.e. people. But we see the system under
government of secret underground organizations. And that is not democracy. And
the civilization cannot be called as civilization if all its mass-media is
under control of the thievish priests with the moral hanging on the argument
YSIHE. The monstrous heap of dogmas of New Magizm on a place of the former
science of physics only illustrates that precipice, which new sacrificers have
dug between their devilish ambitions and political and universal concepts habitual for normal
people. And we
will not forget that all bloody ideas of Nazisms and «New Ordres» of 20th
century originate, anyhow, from forced and official fastening of Magizm
prejudices in thoughts of always-trustful people.
What further?
Certainly,
now there is a blind situation having great public and political significance.
This is a common crisis of the world scale. Repeat: physics only diagnoses this
abscess.
Try
to estimate chances for way out from this crisis of each separate culture or
civilization, which else exists on the Earth.
«Judeo-Christian culture»
(definition, given by Bush the Junior as justification of his right for wars)
is ill hopelessly as it is finally damaged with the hardened system of lie
dogmas, which is executed fully from the point of view of organization up to
the level of the ancient despotism with its secret services, ceremonies of the
hidden making the decisions and global censorship. It is impossible to cure it
with no means due to the blocking by the secret structures of greedy priests
who have been covered reliably with the duty argument YSIHE. Any reasons in
favor of changes are nipped in the bud by the categorical denial of possibility
of any dialog in principle. It is proposed that the open exchange of views is
not necessary any more. This is substituted by rituals of the Masonic clans,
which have been arranged by the type of the Ancient Egyptian communities of the
priests and secret servants of the ancient sadistic cults of the Southern and
Central America. Politics and false physics rather prefer shamanistic rituals
around the so-called idols and their “models” to the disputes of the Ancient
Greece. In short, all this wildness is doomed. Furthermore, it does not contain
even rudiments of mechanism of self-improvement. Quite the contrary, the
censorship and secret communities blocked especially all feedbacks capable to
create such mechanism.
But
is there any other natural way for going out the global crisis? To answer this
question it is necessary to understand what the previous going out from such a
historic dead end of other civilizations is provided with. The examples are
available. Egyptian civilization was lost as the civilizations of Aztecs and
Incas were lost but ancient Greek civilization survived. And many details of
that civilization came to us.
Read
Men [6] again. He wrote clearly how the peoples who were lucky to soak up the
mixture of the neighbor cultures escaped the chains of Magizm: “Most likely,
just in result of large tribal first
great civilizations were born” (p. 63).
That is there is the way out but it is based on the mutual penetration
and interaction of different cultures.
So look at the surrounding.
Cultures of Eastern and South-Eastern Asia
According to conceptions of the dogmatic
physics grounded on the New Magizm one can lay down the hypothesis or “model”,
build the theory on them and to wait for acknowledgement from the Nature. The
Asians who did not lose farming traditions would not construct new barns on basis of the hypothesis that
next time rice would grow with the corns as big as a watermelon. The other
peoples whose life is accompanied with the creative activities or simply
connected with Nature would not do such foolish things. Only the caste of
thieves is able to do such things because their structure of activities does
not contain the creative component: their motto is to steal and to run away and
then everything else can go to hell.
And the long liberation struggle is too
fresh in the memory of these peoples to put the new priests- enslavers on their
neck without complaints.
So the cultures of the Eastern and
South-Eastern Asia are very sensitive to the honest science on one condition:
if their societies would not be destroyed with corruption organized by the new
priests.
Islamic culture
Islam never and with no circumstances will
humble with false revelations, which the New Magizm is bringing. On principle
the religion of Mohammed the Prophet is very stable in resistance to
ideological cheating. And in common, just Moslems started to develop
Aristotlism for studying the surrounding created by Allah (ref. [1]). In that
the exclusive availability of this culture is concluded as for the further
development of physics and natural history.
Culture of South America
Population of South America prefers Roman
Catholic religion. But the ideologist of liberation of physics Thomas Aquinas
is the recognized Holy man of the Roman Catholic Church. So following these
views of this philosopher on the way of learning the nature is the most natural
way of Catholics. In Europe and in the USA the monopoly of the priests of the
New Magizm in mass-media eliminates any objections to them. On the other
continents such resistance to the truth is only in the puppet dictator regimes
which number is being reduced constantly. All these things concern firstly the
countries of South America that also can be considered as perspective in sense
of free development of natural history and physics.
And what hopes are there in Russia?
Hopes are weak but they are available.
Certainly,
any spontaneous actions both among people and in the patriotic circles, inside
the special services and in army are suitable as a saving driving force for
resistance to the systematic fooling. But it is possible only if we are able to
get rid of “western” influence (yoke) through the Masonry. However, too many
things have been sold including the oligarchs and the corrupted officials. But
with uncoordinated forces it will be difficult to cope with them and with
international provocateurs attracted by them. It is only one serious chance
through the union of many cultures of all peoples living in Russia. So there is
the principal necessity to unite all those who is stable in moral and in own
belief, who is ready for normal human communications, in the first turn, who
considers a lie as the sin.
We just must use our chance as the state
that is at the interfaces of many different cultures. The matter does not
concern saving of the “Judeo-Christian Civilization”. One must survive and
develop with the inevitable crash of this civilization.
The conclusion
So, we
studied history of physics and have by chance discerned real historical
mantrap, into which the European culture and a science in 20th century have
putted foot. It emerged that they have undergone to violent immersing in usual
old paganism, which has got now the form of New Magizm. Naturally, this
religious recourse interferes with science development and consequently sooner
or later it will be overcome. Now we can predict a course of the further events
only.
On this way the choice for an
existing civilization is very limited.
Certainly, it is possible to keep any
hopes on the old variant aimed at correction of all anti-scientific system of
views in spite of protests of cheaters of all ranks. But such chances melt
every day.
The “Judeo-Christian Civilization” as we
found out has no perspectives at all. The shameless financial oligarchs and
kings-backsliders proclaim the hosanna to ignorance and obscurantism protecting
them with impenetrable censorship and inquisition. At that they call this as “democracy” mocking at the content and
sense of this concept. But actually we see the organized, deliberate and
coercive introduction of New Magizm in consciousness of people without their
own will and the consent that is in itself in any way not less, than a crime
against humanity. Now we can expect from this false civilization only
initiatives in organization of terror and new wars. But in such fuss as known,
people are not interested in science. There the Satan runs the show.
And generally, why do they do this? It is
not connected with physics, which just turned at the wrong time and in the
wrong place. Why do they need in the “controlled” Masonic “democracy” over the
people fooled with the New Magizm? This question is not to physics and to
physicists, but to politicians and lawyers who are capable to estimate legal
consequences from the theory and practice of a deliberate mass deceit.
Now large even sole hopes are only
connected for us with the close interaction with the other peoples and
cultures. The matter concerns the fact that in the existing situation we can
only step back temporally (not give up) and transfer all discussions and
perspectives of physics into the frames of other fundamental civilizations
(Islamic, Asian and others) which blaming for a lie give the real chances for
normal scientific and human communication without argument YSIHE. The history
confirms that just this variant is more natural and reliable due to the known results
of the centuries-old practice of mixing of different ideologies.
Both we, and those, who go after us,
cannot avoid this principal choice. Finally, the matter concerns not only the
way out from the crisis for one specific science –
physics, but the rescue of civilization on the whole. Inasmuch as the
strong-arm monopoly of Magizm and a Satanism is not a civilization.
Bibliography
1. Á.Ô. Ïîëòîðàöêèé. Ýëåêòðîäèíàìèêà â òåîðèè ïîëÿ è ìàòåðèè. Ì.,
«Sputnik+», 2008.
2. Á.Ô. Ïîëòîðàöêèé. Îò ôèçèêè ê ãèïîòåçàì.
«Ìýéëåð», Ìîñêâà, 2008; ( http://www.inauka.ru/blogs/article87641
; http://www.realphys.com
)
3. Àëåêñàíäð Ìåíü. Èñòîðèÿ ðåëèãèè. Ò.2. Ì., ÑÏ
«Ñëîâî», 1991
4. Àðèñòîòåëü.
Ôèçèêà. Ïåðåâîä Â.Ï. Êàðïîâà èç êíèãè "Ôèëîñîôû Ãðåöèè îñíîâû
îñíîâ", ÝÊÑÌÎ-Ïðåññ, Õàðüêîâ, 1999
5.
Paul
Strathern. Aristotle in 90 minutes. Chicago: Ivan R.Dee, 1996
6. Ôîìà
Àêâèíñêèé. Ñóììà òåîëîãèè. «Íèêà-Öåíòð», Êèåâ, 2007
7. Âêëàä
èñëàìà â ðàçâèòèå ìèðîâîé öèâèëèçàöèè. Ñïðàâî÷íèê.
http://www.islamnews.ru/pages-8.html
8. Õðàìîâ
Þ. À. Ôèçèêè. Áèîãðàôè÷åñêèé ñïðàâî÷íèê, Ì., Íàóêà, 1983
9. Èñààê
Íüþòîí. Ìàòåìàòè÷åñêèå íà÷àëà íàòóðàëüíîé ôèëîñîôèè. Ì. «Íàóêà», 1989
10.
Êóäðÿâöåâ Ï. Ñ. Êóðñ èñòîðèè ôèçèêè. Ì. «Ïðîñâåùåíèå», 1982
11.
James Clerk
Maxwell. Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, v. X, 1855 – 1856
12.
James Clerk
Maxwell. Royal Society Transactions, v. CLV, 1864
13. Ñ.Í. Ïóõîâ. Íîâàÿ ýëåêòðîäèíàìèêà äâèæóùèõñÿ
òåë. 1994
14. Ô.Ô.
Ìåíäå. Íåïðîòèâîðå÷èâàÿ ýëåêòðîäèíàìèêà.
15. Â.Ô.
Äüÿ÷åíêî. Äåñÿòü ëåêöèé ïî ôèçè÷åñêîé ìàòåìàòèêå. Ìîñêâà, «Ôàêòîðèàë», 1997.
16. G. Mie. Ann. d. Physik, 30,
57 (1908)
17. M. Born, E. Wolf. Principles of optics. N-Y, Pergamon press, 1964 (Ì.Áîðí è Å. Âîëüô, Îñíîâû îïòèêè. Ì.,
«Íàóêà», 1973)
18. Î.Í. Ñòðåëüíèê. Ôèëîñîôèÿ. Ìîñêâà, «Þðàéò»,
2008
19.
La
Vey, Anton S. The Satanic Bible. Avon. 1976
20.
R.P. Feynman.
Quantum electrodynamics. W.A. Benjamain, Inc. N-Y. 1961
21. B.F. Poltoratsky. Fundamental
particles in pictures and without hypothesis. Ì., «Sputnik+», 2007.
.